If I were to use your rubric, I think the only thing I would classify as knowledge is the internal stream of thoughts in my mind, that is pretty much inseparable from me -- the person. I don't see anyway that this could be claimed by another person. They can only claim the products of my person. And that's where I'm asking whether it makes sense to try to gate access to one's ideas. 

Scoresby

Who Owns Your Brain?: How "AI" Might Break Work Completely - Brainfork

What you are presenting are two different concepts, in my opinion. One thing is knowledge and another is an idea. You transcribe ideas and present them publicly based on your knowledge, so that agents and people can read them, people will gain knowledge or not, and agents will add their language and mix it with many others to answer the questions of idiots who can barely think for themselves. Continue spreading ideas, adding knowledge to people. Our knowledge is private, and nothing and no one can access it except for the tidbits we share through ideas.