pull down to refresh

Your thoughts here, is a powerful reminder that hodling alone isn’t enough. Bitcoin becomes truly transformational only when used as both a Store of Value and a Medium of Exchange. A strong foundation of savings is crucial, yes — but the next level is spending, earning, and pricing in sats. That’s how we break the fiat spell. A Bitcoin economy can’t be built on cold wallets alone — it needs circular usage, peer-to-peer flows, and businesses that operate natively in BTC. Only then do hodlers gain real leverage: not just refusing to sell, but choosing to live entirely outside the fiat system.
I agree and I would say the circular economy is in the Bitcoin Countries I hint on. Though I feel there is also economic power in hodling so tightly especially when every BTC transaction in a circular flow is pawned by fiat (which should enjoy tapping BTCs power for itself - dollar milkshake theory). In my hypothetical world, I'd say super hodling is like a Bitcoin offensive whereas championing P2P is more a defensive strategy. Thoughts on this will be appreciated.
reply