pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 7 Aug \ parent \ on: The AI era is breaking the glass ceiling for solo founders?! AI
It is if you don't know what you're doing, so you need a pro for your MVP, probably at least 2. However, we'd normally want a couple more. So you still need capital for that stage, and your demo will be a throwaway, but I agree that there's much more flexibility and potentially some cost savings.
It is if you don't know what you're doing, so you need a pro for your MVP, probably at least 2. However, we'd normally want a couple more. So you still need capital for that stage, and your demo will be a throwaway, but I agree that there's much more flexibility and potentially some cost savings.
Well, at least some will refuse to develop their own junk, others will think about hiring a specialist, others will start learning themselves and achieving results — in my opinion, all this is already not bad!
reply
The danger is in the advertisement when someone sloppy-vibes a "product" together. Unless it's open source (it takes extraordinary unselfish attitude and at least a decade of runway to open-source a truly novel idea) and we can judge for ourselves if it is slop, the risk is real. Especially in the bitcoin space where we are currently seeing slop product after slop product fail, and we've only just started.
Therefore, I think that the proliferation of LLMs as vibe coding tools is much more powerful as a personal toolset development strategy than a product development strategy, but time will have to tell if I'm right about this.
reply