pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @perscrutador 5 Aug \ on: 1,333,337 Sats Withheld in Controversial Writing Competition BooksAndArticles
It's good to see that no matter how much you've participated, you have firm and clear positions on this. That quote is beautiful.
There seems to be a lack of this being and differentiation between people, art is not and never will be something that a machine can create. No matter how beautiful it is, the moment it is established that it was made by a machine pure and simple, it will become dead.
Without detracting from the work you presented in this competition, what you did there is more like a hacking job.
Whether machines can or can't create art is up to us! We must maintain our sovereignty to ascribe value rather than valuing what machines tell us to.
Thinking is hard, but just because machines can computer larger amounts of data faster than our brains doesn't mean our brains are old tech.
reply
Machines are not a problem; they help us a lot in many tasks. The problem is attributing exclusively human elements to a crude emulation of those elements. “Artificial Intelligence” is a completely wrong name, since it is not intelligent in the strict sense of the word. It depends on human input and, through mathematical and linguistic processing based on unreliable sources and some specific guidelines in its code, it gives us an answer in the form of intelligible language. It is nothing more than emulation.
It seems that the more advanced we become energetically, the more stupid and inferior we become in our feelings. We are always doubting our own capabilities as a species.
reply