Just read that piece on Bitcoin Magazine and honestly, it really resonated with me. It’s a refreshing reminder that Bitcoin isn’t just about how technically “pure” or massive your node is it’s about what kind of real impact you’re making. The post shifts the tired debates around purism and size into something way more grounded: how people from all walks teachers, artists, coders, node runners are expanding the space in meaningful ways just by doing.
What I liked most is how it gently calls out the whole purity test mentality without being aggressive. It’s like, yeah, ideals matter but building tools, teaching others, helping someone self-custody for the first time that’s what really scales Bitcoin. The message is clear: stop obsessing over being the “right kind” of Bitcoiner and focus on participation that actually moves the needle. Definitely worth the read if you’re over the same old tribal arguments and want something that feels more open, inclusive, and productive.
Just read that piece on Bitcoin Magazine and honestly, it really resonated with me. It’s a refreshing reminder that Bitcoin isn’t just about how technically “pure” or massive your node is it’s about what kind of real impact you’re making. The post shifts the tired debates around purism and size into something way more grounded: how people from all walks teachers, artists, coders, node runners are expanding the space in meaningful ways just by doing.
What I liked most is how it gently calls out the whole purity test mentality without being aggressive. It’s like, yeah, ideals matter but building tools, teaching others, helping someone self-custody for the first time that’s what really scales Bitcoin. The message is clear: stop obsessing over being the “right kind” of Bitcoiner and focus on participation that actually moves the needle. Definitely worth the read if you’re over the same old tribal arguments and want something that feels more open, inclusive, and productive.