pull down to refresh

I'm sorry, what?
The former chancellor (= Britain's Treasury secretary in the 2010s) is out swining and saying "it's time for Bitcoin to catch up on cryptocurrencies"??
WTF is this timeline.
When you take money out of an ATM, you check that no one is watching. When, as chancellor, I used Britain’s first bitcoin ATM, the cameras were filming. Our message was: “If crypto is happening, then we want it to happen here.” That was 11 years ago. I got two things wrong.
  1. "it’s taken over a decade for crypto assets to become mainstream. Financial revolutions are slow to start but eventually overwhelming."
  2. "I handed back to the Treasury the bitcoin I withdrew. Today, it’s worth over 200 times more than I paid."

obviously

Some insiders don't even get a cushy after-politics job?
These days I sit on Coinbase’s global advisory council rather than in Number 11, and what I see makes me anxious. Far from being an early adopter, we have allowed ourselves to be left behind. 
if you live in New York or Nebraska, you can buy a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) from BlackRock. It’s their most successful ETF. But in London or Leeds, you’re banned from doing so if you’re a retail investor. This hasn’t stopped over 8mn Britons buying crypto; it just means the companies handling this wealth are overseas.

"to buy bitcoin in the UK you have to pass a test and wait for 24 hours to be onboarded. This consumer 'protection' has 'protected' Britons from the best-performing financial asset of the past decade."

LOL, OWNED.
the majority of UK retail banks have placed restrictions on transferring funds to cryptoasset exchanges. In short, the “on-ramps” from fiat currencies to crypto are being closed off just as the US moves to open them.  
I mean, I understand that he has to say that, supporting Crapbase and all, but... after that impassioned speech, you're gonna champion for stablezcoinz?? Pathetic.
digital transfers of money are much easier to track than physical ones. Try following a £50 note or $20 bill.
Well, the UK banned TV-ad was fun:

True or false? Stablecoins are (at best) just regulatory / interoperability arbitrage. There's nothing fundamentally innovative about them. At worst, they could be scams and frauds.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 15h
True (for the most part). I do wonder how hard it is to keep a peg in practice.
reply
I imagine not too difficult... you just have to put up enough buy/sell orders on the major exchanges at the peg to satisfy daily volume.
Though I suppose it gets harder and harder if the volume is consistently biased in one direction
reply
I have never understood the point of stablecoins and maintain that they are dumb.
reply
I can see how they get US-dollar-like instruments into the hands of people who otherwise wouldn't have access. But that's still just a form of regulatory arbitrage to me.
reply
Bitcoin > dollars
So, why do I want dollars?
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 15h
I think I will also say true. Credit card networks reach a large portion of the world, but why can't they offer as cheap a service to as wide a population? I assume it's mostly regulation, but it may also possibly be that they are using crappy infrastructure (a credit instrument and banking rails) rather than a wifi connection and a database. In such a case, stablecoin innovation is better payment infrastructure? Regulatory arbitrage seems like the more reasonable answer, though.
reply
It's probably a combination of regulatory friction leading to bad infrastructure which was built to accommodate those regulations.
reply
54 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 17h
Stablecoins are going to the moon!!!!
reply
Unlike loser-ass Bitcoin, they have the appreciation potential of the British Pound!
reply
It sounds comical, but it's terrible that they think consumers are so stupid as to put their trust in Coinbase, which looks more like Evil Corp to me. What's worse, they're right to think so, because the normies will run to the safety of their recommendation, the stablecoins that are nothing more than garbage backed by more garbage. Not even the subprime mountain stank as much as the ETFs and stablecoins backed by fiat currencies and bitcoin controlled by corporate insiders. I don't know if they've ever done this, but it would be interesting to know how corporations work to maintain the appearance of control over something as individual as bitcoin.
reply