pull down to refresh

250 sats \ 3 replies \ @nout 13 Dec 2022 \ on: Daily discussion thread
₿ 0,01 234 567 sats is the right way to format sats! Tell me why I'm wrong.
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @scottathan 14 Dec 2022
Personally I'm a fan of bits. 1 bit = 100 sats, so 1,234,567 sats would be 12,345.67 bits
For really small micropayments like here on SN though, just using sats makes more sense. But for larger amounts of bitcoin, the bit and the mBTC are very useful
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 14 Dec 2022
It'd be so much cleaner if there were 1 billion sats per bitcoin.
reply
95 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 14 Dec 2022
I have seen and worked in various odd numeric systems that different countries use, so I sort of got used to it. Not everyone uses 1000 based grouping...
reply