On July 18, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed to have “overwhelming evidence” that President Barack Obama himself, as well as key members of his administration, “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump.”
In other words, the basis for the Russiagate collusion hoax claimed by Democrats after the 2016 presidential election in which President Donald Trump allegedly conspired with Russia to win. After a two-year investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, nothing was found that indicated this.
Gabbard is claiming to have new information and evidence about what was done and who did it. The director shared that in the months before the November 2016 election the Intelligence Community (IC) assessed that Russia was “probably not trying…to influence the election by using cyber means,” and that in early December after the election, DNI James Clapper was given talking points that read “foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome. …
Seems like she means business. “No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again,” she insisted. “The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it. As such, I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve.”
These are serious accusations. A conventional or ideal, baseline functional, mainstream press that actually challenged power and sought truth might have an interest in it.
The United States doesn’t have one of those. To CNN and their legacy media colleagues, the phrase “Democratic republic” means something entirely different.
And so now the establishment press is acting accordingly. Like they always do.
Serving and protecting Democrats.
Imagine that, the Democrats have a much different view of what “Democratic republic” means. I guess it means that it is their republic and they will do everything they can to keep it as their republic as theirs. Ummmm…. Does that mean that they want to do just what they want to do and the devil take your ideas and wants? That sounds very familiar. However, this, “Whatever necessary to achieve their ends,” doesn’t sound very healthy to me. It seems that wherever ”The ends justify the means,” is used, there are very disastrous results for the population. Is that what we are looking for?