pull down to refresh

100 sats \ 4 replies \ @unschooled OP 7h \ parent \ on: my problem with zaps the_stacker_muse
thanks i appreciate that.
despite the provocative title, i didnt mean it as a complaint, but a reflection on how even though what we have on sn is great, the rewards structure seems to promote conformist behaviour for zaps/comments. but, then again, it promotes zaps, which might be good enough.
bribery ... dwell on
this was tangential, not a major concern of mine.
are you getting the meaningful interactions you're obviously looking for, and if not (do give it a little more than 2.5 weeks into territory existence), what are you going to do about it?
yes, this is indeed the question. i'll admit i'm learning and i'm quite enjoying the process. good thing i enjoy a challenge!
write
preview
this territory is moderated
110 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 7h
I don't really see the conformism; do you see that expressed in the desire to comment or the desire to earn sats through posts / comments?
reply
200 sats \ 2 replies \ @unschooled OP 6h
it might be imagined.
i discussed it here #1056786 where undisciplined informed me of the concept of keynsian beauty contest, which i think captures what im getting at pretty well.
reply
110 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 6h
I'm not sure about top-post zapping as a form of conformity. I tell myself that if I happen to get a front-page post, it gets zapped because people became aware, read and then appreciated my post. Yes, I guess that I'm that naive, haha.
Either way, in the spirit of being the delusion you want to have, I mostly zap non front-page posts: more in recent and what I get alerted about in notifications from stackers I subscribe to. And the majority is comments.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @unschooled OP 5h
being the delusion you want to have,
ha-ha! i'm something of an expert in this myself, and i'm not talking about zapping...
reply