Do humans who write with machine assistance understand what they are saying? If someone is using AI tools to fill in factual content in a way they don't understand, that should be easy enough to figure out by a competent reader or teacher.
I remember at times in school we used to copy stuff straight out of the book we were studying. There was definitely not much learning from doing that.
Would be great, because I will regain at least an hour each day that I currently spend on solving captchas. The recently updated cloudflare check shows me up to 6 puzzles in a row before it lets me in right now. More if I don't use tor (and thus come from a known VPN endpoint)
That's nice! I can re-evaluate all I want but the threat assessment isn't going to change for me.
Not even under this nym on SN, because it's pretty bad if someone gets to correlate, say, a zap that likely came from me to IP logs obtained from any of the places that are auto-embedded, per the security policy on / these are:
Any of these sites leak info with timestamped IP addresses on access logs, I'm effed. Oh and any GitHub interaction (filing issue/pr, commenting) is a leak because IP addresses are visible to repo owners.
Seriously people think AI is bad while it is good to help you correct grammar mistake and correct the ton of message, there is a big difference between just copy paste meta AI responses and you organize ideas with AI which not anyone could understand.
/these are: