I did not like the way the article was framed. Before the question part of the interview, the writer already tells you how you should read the interview.
Over a 90-minute conversation, Johnson spoke at length about his longevity protocol, his assessment of RFK Jr.’s MAHA movement, and those agreements that he continues to enforce. He also took great pains to convince me—and all of you—that this wasn’t just about health and longevity. No, like most tech men living in boxy modernist homes and saddled with illusions of grandeur, Johnson has a new holy grail with which to galvanize his faithful following: artificial intelligence, baby.
I could have written: the writer took great pains to convince me, and all of you, that this wasn't about understanding Johnson. No, like most disingenuous journalist, saddled with illusions of moral superiority, she found a new way to galvanize her faithful following: bashing the tech bros.
That being said, i also think lots of what Johnson does is silicon valley bullshit, but please, let Johnson's words talk for themselves.
(Yes, i know, the irony is not lost on me when giving the context in the way i do now~~)