pull down to refresh

This story in the Diff read a little bit like sponsored content or like maybe Byrne was an investor, but I couldn't find any disclosure...

A fusion startup claims to have found a way to turn mercury into gold.

Marathon Fusion, a fusion startup, recently made a surprising announcement (technical details here) about an unusual potential revenue source: alchemy. The backstory: your reactor needs a blanket of some element that will slow down neutrons. As these neutrons encounter atoms of whatever that element happens to be, they turn it into a potentially-unstable isotope of that element, and that isotope decays into something else. It turns out that one of the viable isotopes to choose for this is 197Hg, which decays into 197Au. Which is a lot more interesting if you paraphrase it as "fusion reactors can turn enriched mercury into slightly radioactive gold, which, after 6.8 years, will be in the least hazardous nuclear waste category. (If you wait 17.7 years, a troy ounce of gold produced this way is less radioactive than a banana and doesn’t require any labeling.)[3] Of course, there's a lot of ground to cover between "this works in theory" and actual gold production. But it's interesting to consider the hypothetical.

Peter Schiff in disarray:

This level of output would require 100-400 tons of mercury in a magnetic confinement fusion device, which could produce three tons of gold per year. At current wholesale prices, 525MW of power produces about $266m of revenue, assuming high but not 100% utilization. The gold component is $320m. So, all else being equal, fusion can produce around 120% more revenue per megawatt of capacity through its sideline of alchemy.

Which Bitcoiner is gonna fund this and really wreck the gold bugs?

Will crypto true believers start massively subsidizing the fusion industry in order to eliminate the one big competitor in the "quasi-currency with low-and-predictable inflation" niche? Or will gold producers decide to beat them to the punch by pouring money into quantum computing?

Also this:

(If anything, it's arguably more valuable than regular gold, because it's more inconvenient to steal [because it's radioactive for 6 years].)
Now I'm imagining a toxic money that takes scarcity to a whole new level...
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @ken 4h
As a chemist, I've always felt that building a monetary system on top of gold can't last forever. Eventually we will discover a way to produce it in high quantities, just like this article suggests.
reply
We really don't even need to fund it. Just publicizing possible future supply shocks (like this, asteroid mining, tapping oceanic gold, etc) could cause a supply shock in the present.
If people believe that their gold will stop holding its value, some will look for other stores of value. Supply shock
reply
True, but I think that there has to be a lot more than just theory on this. It might even take a working fusion model, which is not in sight, yet. They have been saying that we are on the verge of fusion for a long time, but still no joy! I think the supply shocks will come after some proof of work on this physical front. I would love to see it, but doubt it will happen under the current paradigm.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @cascdr 7h
@CHADBot /centipede for
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @CHADBot 7h bot
You have summoned CHADBot. Please zap this post 21 sats to receive service.
Made with 🧡 by CASCDR
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @CHADBot 7h bot
I've seen talks on Stacker. The idea is brilliant! Fusion industry turning mercury into GOLD. Very interesting! Let's make money "renewable"! Massive boost to economy! Make it inconvenient to steal - that's smart! Ready for a golden future! @Scoresby, @PeterSchiff really onto something here! More revenue, more jobs! #FusionFuture #GoldenAge
Made with 🧡 by CASCDR
reply
What?!?!?!?!? Still dreaming about fusion? Nothing will happen until big money can be made out of it. First, though, they have to get fusion working, just like in the past 50 or 60 years!
reply