pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @jakoyoh629 7h \ on: Paysats: Well-Known Bitcoin Identity Endpoint Draft BIP - aviv57 bitcoin
People sometimes mention 'Bitcoin ossification,' and I'm not 100% on it, but this article looks like it's saying the opposite. What do you think?
write
preview
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Scoresby OP 7h
BIPs are by definition changes to Bitcoin (BIPS = Bitcoin Improvement Proposals).
reply
102 sats \ 4 replies \ @jakoyoh629 7h
Right, but isn't that bucking up against ossification?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 6h
I suppose I understood your comment to be about BIP 353 somehow specifically "saying the opposite" of ossification. It doesn't buck against ossification any more than any other BIP does.
As far as ossification: that's a much bigger issue. I think you could probably write something interesting about it as a separate post and I"m sure people would be interested to read it.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @jakoyoh629 6h
Ok, I get it, that's not related. Sorry for the off-topic!
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 6h
This is only a proposal and it's also not even a proposal to change the protocol
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jakoyoh629 6h
My bad, sorry!
reply