I’m a third through Vernor Vinge’s A Deepness in the Sky and it just warmed up. I didn’t have the same problem with the first book in the series, A fire upon the deep. The first book was so good I suppose that’s what motivated me to this point in the second.
I have my own thoughts on why there’s a difference between these books, but I’m wondering if there are certain rules of thumb that accelerate the desire to climb through a narrative.
Do any writers here know? If there are such rules of thumb, do writers abandon them as a challenge to themselves?
(I find unmotivated context loading the greatest hazard to my reading habit.)