pull down to refresh

You can create items but fail to pay for them. Then they will not show up for anyone else.

I think that's a bug. Should probably be fixed asap.

reply

It's not a bug, it always worked like that.

The ids are sequential, and you can always still pay for an item.

Once an id was assigned, it's gone.

reply

I still think it should be fixed. Haha

reply

I respect that opinion haha

reply

It's more complicated than just unpaid items or deletions. Rollbacks after inserts also leave "holes" in sequences.

Because smallserial, serial and bigserial are implemented using sequences, there may be "holes" or gaps in the sequence of values which appears in the column, even if no rows are ever deleted. A value allocated from the sequence is still "used up" even if a row containing that value is never successfully inserted into the table column. This may happen, for example, if the inserting transaction rolls back.

Afaik the best we can say about sequences is that they're monotonically increasing (if NO CYCLE is used (which is the default)).

The id is not the item count. It's a rough overestimate of the item count.

reply

You could just make a temporary buffer (new table) until the item paid.

reply

100% not worth it.

reply

I bet that's a pain in the ass. Any way to know the real number of paid items right now?

reply

SQL's count.

reply

No doubt you can do it. I was just asking the pleb stacker!

What about a sudden spike in total daily items?
Is SN going parabolic all of a sudden?

reply

THE RETAIL IS COMING!

lol, cope

reply

If you give a look at recent/all, there's certainly a new wave of stackers who are creating items. And the old ones have also been more activated. Certainly it looks like the rough patch has been mended all of a sudden.

reply

Copium and hopium

reply

There's a bug in your bet. Our ids are working as intended. :P

reply

Haha there is only a bug if I lose.

reply

not too late to join the bright side

reply

Yes, I also think so. The way daily item numbers have increased in last two days, it's more likely a bug.

Even then I think @ek has suggested how we can manipulate that market and make profit.

Should we try it?

reply

Makes perfect sense. @mega_dreamer has gotta have access to the items that are paid up!

4.31?

reply

I have no insider information - I tired to bribe @ek but he refused to divulge any intel 😈.

reply

After we found out that unpaid items are getting queued up, there's gotta be a way to figure out the exact numbers. Otherwise, the whole market's screwed. This is trickier than it looks, because you just assumed there were "X" items when you opened the market, but turns out it was "X minus Y." I figure the right way to fix the market is to do: items at the start of the market + new items - unpaid items from the start of the market.

reply

Ahh! Didn't know that.
Is there any chance of improving this to 'no item creation' for 'failing to pay'?

reply