pull down to refresh

By Patrick Carroll
While we often speak of measurements of inflation (such as “inflation went up by 3 percent”), in reality, one cannot accurately measure it, given official measurements consist of arbitrary weighted averages. It is better to see inflation as qualitative, not quantitative.
It’s hard to ditch a useful term—even if it’s wrong.
Ain't that the truth. I don't like the proposed replacement, though. Quantify is only very slightly better.
There is a certain allure to the Big Mac index.
reply
In Zimbabwe during the hyperinflation there was a "3 boiled eggs" index, that was actually reported on in financial reports.
The Big Mac index seems too changeable. It might just be me, but I feel like hamburgers have been getting thinner.
Yesterday I had a reminder of shrinkflation - I just looked in a bathroom cabinet, where we had stocked up on some shampoo on sale. The new bottle vs the old one (bottle size was different, but both were called a "family pack" and were otherwise the same) was a shrinkage of 15% in contents.
reply
Parker Lewis has been doing a yearly check on the price of ribeye at the same grocery store for five years.
reply
I like these unofficial and localized data collections — precisely because they’re not a general snapshot, they avoid the biases of locations and seasonal patterns that don’t matter to me.
reply
Also grocery store prices are an excellent gauge because they can’t gouge. Profit margins are 1 or 2 percent
reply
53 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibertasBR 18h
I agree. Official measurements aren’t reliable since the methods, no matter how open they are, don’t guarantee that the data was collected properly.
reply
In Brazil you can gauge inflation by the price of cheese bread and caipirinha
reply
I’m not sold on the solution either. I just think these methodological critiques are useful context for interpreting official statistics.
reply
Clean links, no tracking BS? Much hotter!
reply