pull down to refresh

After four years of the Biden administration pushing the limits of Modern Monetary Theory with Build Back Better, the Green New Deal, and Activist Treasury Issuance, the Trump administration and Congressional Republicans said “hold my beer” this week with the passage of Trump’s own jumbo-sized, triple-B spending plan, the Big Beautiful Bill. Precisely what the new budget will do to federal deficits over the next few years is anyone’s guess, but whatever your estimate is, we’ll take the over. President Trump had a simple consolation for those stodgy fiscal conservative dinosaurs hand-wringing about what the bill might do to the US’s already bloated federal debt, noting that we’ll make it all back with “GROWTH, more than ever before,” echoing Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s talk track in recent weeks. The Treasury Secretary’s messaging shift has apparently also bled into his views on the federal maturity ladder, as Bessent, who just last year criticized Janet Yellen’s aggressive shift of debt issuance to the short end of the yield curve as an attempt to drive a “sugar high” in the economy, flatly said this week that he has no intentions to term out Treasuries beyond the short-end anytime soon. As Trump continues to publicly attack Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s decision to maintain benchmark interest rates and the administration teases the announcement of a more, ahem, accommodative Fed Chair, it increasingly looks like the plan is to pretty explicitly and transparently pin yields and let nominal growth rip. Historically, such an environment has been very kind to hard assets without sovereign liability – it might make sense to get some just in case Trump does exactly what he’s telling you he’s going to do.
hard assets without sovereign liability – it might make sense to get some just in case
What hard assets have no sovereign liability?
reply
I’m not really sure, but I think precious metals might be an example. Maybe @Undisciplined knows a bit more about it.
reply
That’s probably what the author has in mind. Although, they may be thinking of tangible assets more broadly.
reply
I have a feeling Trump wants the dollar to be devalued, so that US can manufacture things and export them. Just a feeling I have.
reply
Yeah, maybe, that’s an old trick.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 20h
Tariffs are indirect currency devaluation
reply
Exactly. But only when it is on everything. It is a good tool to protect a industry. But it is now abused. Funfact: the us was always fighting for a free market with no taxes. It accused other nations of violating free market rules by taxing foreign or subsidize its own industry. And now this.
reply