The insurance is meant for operational fuck-ups, if their entire portfolio of insurees get pwned that's Force majeure.

Cope harder shitcoiner. 

> Taproot being a huge mistake and relatively new, storing large amounts of coin in a tapscript isn't aligned to a risk-averse strategy either.

This is hilarious and ridiculous FUD given the bitcoin you deposit with anchorwatch is literally insured. 

1fatmess

AskSN

Would you insure your Bitcoin using AnchorWatch?

BlokchainB

> You have to use their hardware devices

This would defeat the purpose imo, may as well just use an insured custodian if you're doing "self-custody" with their infrastructure.

I think the product makes more sense for company treasuries where the investors demand this to mitigate key-man risk

Taproot being a huge mistake and relatively new, storing large amounts of coin in a tapscript isn't aligned to a risk-averse strategy either.