I wouldn't call Spark "shared custody", but the Spark operator is well-known - its Lightspark, they're not trying to hide that. Also, Lightspark's regulated money transmission business is separate from the Spark product, even though its from the same company.

bluematt

Spark is, of course, much better than a classic custodial wallet.

Isn’t it better when nodes are privately run with shared custody? At least in the current models we know which company is behind it — no one’s being misled. In the other model, they lie and hide this. Many have warned about this here.

bitcoin

No, the new Wallet of Satoshi is not "self-custodial"

>Spark is, of course, much better than a classic custodial wallet.

Isn’t it better when nodes are privately run with shared custody? At least in the current models we know which company is behind it — no one’s being misled. In the other model, they lie and hide this. Many have warned about this here.

https://stacker.news/items/1019656/r/LibertasBR?commentId=1019734

