reply on: Why do ~Stacker_sports posts struggle to make it to the front page of SN? \ stacker news ~Stacker

pull down to refresh

57 sats \ 12 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 29 Jun \ on: Why do ~Stacker_sports posts struggle to make it to the front page of SN? Stacker_Sports

This is too much hatred!!

On top of the day....

I don't understand how this makes SN better??

CC: @grayruby @Undisciplined @0xbitcoiner

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 29 Jun

50 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 29 Jun

It is quite funny that it is below a few posts that have zero sats and zero comments.

I honestly don't care because Stacker Sports has a great community of stackers that are very active and engaged. Sports isn't for everyone and it makes sense stackers more broadly prefer posts about bitcoin, econ, tech etc.

I don't want to get into another tiff with @k00b about the trust scores. It simply is what it is. We just need to get people to sub.

142 sats \ 6 replies \ @Carresan 30 Jun

Stacker Sports has a great community of stackers that are very active and engaged.

I think this is what we need to focus on. Just enjoying sports and the rest will eventually come. I enjoy everything that happens in the territory. @Undisciplined and you do a great job with the podcast, contests, posts and supporting everyone in the territory. I have been taking part in sports that I have never been interested in and I have found that I like them too. It's a great place to share opinions and enjoy others' comments.

What I really don't get is about downzapping. If I don't like a post, no zaps. If I like, zap! Can't understand the sense of punishment with the downzapping.

57 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 30 Jun

I think downzapping has value in some instances but to downzap just because you don’t like a certain topic, territory of stacker is silly. Just mute them.

35 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 30 Jun

I think downzapping should be reserved for malicious posts like spam, plagiarism, ai slop, etc.

However, it is just a tool and everyone gets to choose how they want to use it.

82 sats \ 0 replies \ @Carresan 30 Jun

Yes, I understand that it could be a useful tool for the cases you mention though it may be used just to harm someone else. It must be really annoying to keep downzapping posts just for the sake of harming.

57 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 30 Jun

You know what downzapping needs. More communism. Downzapping for everyone.

40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Carresan 30 Jun

😂 😂

reply on another page

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 30 Jun

Thanks

40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 29 Jun

Maybe you are right. Maybe I just overthought about it. My intention was just to say that I liked the personalised front page but I forgot I might recieve the whip for saying what's righteous.

Anyways, I'll try to stay away from saying things about SN.

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 29 Jun

I do think you have a point. I just think it is a difficult problem to have an algorithmic trust system that is perfect. Overall it is pretty good. We know you have a couple people or at least one that likes to downzap your content as well. Maybe sports gets downzapped more in general.

40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter OP 29 Jun

Thanks.

We know you have a couple people.....

Hmmm, maybe more! I don't mind it now though. In fact If they are reading it, I dare them to downzap everything from me if they can. I'll gladly accept their hatred (and sats too).