pull down to refresh

yeah, that's the major tail risk. And I'm fairly confident that if/when shit hits the fan, my mafiosos will just tax or outright steal the sums currently custodied with a fund. (see Australia, already trying to tax out large Superannuation accounts.)
I wonder if that risk is rivalled/mitigated by other fiat ways of holding assets -- i.e., property or stocks or bank accounts?
Maybe private equity/credit? Seems like it would be harder for the gov't to seize. If you have loaned someone money or contributed funds to their private enterprise, the relationship can be more straightforward. No central broker custodying everything. But I suppose that comes with other risks. And they can tax such investments any way they like. But then bitcoin doesn't fix taxation, either.
reply
I am one step removed in that it's not a government pension scheme, but (ostensibly) private, and consisting of real assets rather than fake claims on future gov payouts. I have that going for me
reply