reply on: nsite - Why Decentralized Static Website Hosting on Nostr \ stacker news ~nostr

pull down to refresh

5 sats \ 13 replies \ @ek 27 Jun \ parent \ on: nsite - Why Decentralized Static Website Hosting on Nostr nostr

nsite.lol does not load for me, I reached out to @sandwich on nostr

I think a static website that advertises decentralized static website hosting should use it themselves first

Do you have an nsite for me then? I suspect every navigation on the site is going to be really slow and if it's not slow, it's probably cached and then it's not really decentralized.

100 sats \ 4 replies \ @sandwich 22h

Gateways don't have to be on remote servers, they could be native apps.

If a website goes down for whatever reason and you are trying to access it, you won't care that it takes an extra 2 seconds.

There are many nsites already, here's one:

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @sandwich 22h

correct link: https://npub1nsyte9neefm3jle7dg5gw6mhchxyk75a6f5dng70l4l3a2mx0nashqv2jk.nsite.lol/

1042 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 18h

^^ @ek - bug report - the parser should not replace the npub with njump link in a situation where the npub is a part of an URL.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 18h

thanks, created a ticket

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 21h

Gateways don't have to be on remote servers, they could be native apps.

Mhh, ok, that is interesting!

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @supratic OP 27 Jun

refresh, probably to many requests

42 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 27 Jun

So nsite.lol is the real showcase I guess. It's slow or doesn't load.

33 sats \ 4 replies \ @sandwich 22h

nsite.lol is a gateway, it requires a subdomain. There is no "real showcase," just a list of tools for a young ecosystem. Gateways should have simple homepages.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 22h

What happens if the gateway goes down?

edit: okay, I guess you could use another gateway (assuming there is one), but sounds to me like access to any nsite still depends on going through a gateway and if there aren't many, they will be a bottleneck since they are serving all the content, no?