pull down to refresh

If you could invent something to fulfill an economist’s dream, it would look an awful lot like a prediction market. A world where every uncertain future can be priced, hedged and insured against? Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu would approve. A market mechanism to co-ordinate the decentralised wisdom of crowds, ensuring the accuracy of such prices? Adam Smith and Friedrich Hayek sought just that.
The absence of serious capital reflects several factors. One is scale. Although presidential races draw widespread interest—some $3.7bn was wagered on Polymarket in the most recent—other events attract less action. Consider inflation, an important economic variable. The market for Treasury inflation-protected securities, which reflect investors’ expectations for consumer prices, is worth nearly $2trn. By contrast, the most active financial market on Polymarket (“What price will bitcoin hit in June?”) has welcomed wagers worth just $22m. Low liquidity poses a number of challenges. The biggest investors may have hedging needs that exceed the size of the markets themselves. Moreover, thin markets are vulnerable to price manipulation by large traders, as has happened several times in prediction markets.
So, what are predyx's strategies to really take off?
68 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 5h
By contrast, the most active financial market on Polymarket (“What price will bitcoin hit in June?”) has welcomed wagers worth just $22m.
Perhaps this is because "the market" is of the opinion that prediction markets aren't an optimal tool for hedging if you also have leveraged futures that are much more straight forward? (and potentially cheaper?)
Compare the volume of prediction markets re: BTC price, versus open interest on futures - first aggregate I could find: https://coinalyze.net/bitcoin/open-interest/
22M vs 37B at peak.
Say you would convert $5000 of your hard earned fiat wage into sats earlier this week when it dumped under 100k. There's always a chance that it will dump further. So, to hedge, you convert only $4900 and put $100 with 50x leverage on BitMex' short perp BTC/USD. Now you're hedged at the max cost of 2% of your trade - like insurance against it dumping further to $70k. If that happens, you at some point simply cover or close your position and buy sats with your "insurance payout".
How would a prediction market that tracks sentiment be more efficient than a direct hedge?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 2h
They just need more volume right?
Maybe a cleaner UX and some slick marketing would help.
reply