pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln OP 17h \ parent \ on: From MIT, an instruction manual for turning research into startups science
If I read you correctly, you're against the hyperinflated US unicorn culture, but also against EU-style bureaucracy and inefficient use of funds.
Seems like a reasonable take.
I wonder if anyone has found a middle ground between those two extremes...
I wonder if anyone has found a middle ground between those two extremes...
There are way more small businesses in any place that don't get billion dollar valuations or grant money than there are unicorns. So I think the answer already exists. They're just not newsworthy because they are plenty. Most of them are ran by hardworking smart people. People that don't measure themselves against billionaires but get satisfaction from the impact they have, even if its just in their local community.
I think that it's good that MIT wants there to be more and better incubators though; incubators may help people get on the right track and stay on it. Also, the idea to actively develop otherwise idle patents is great. Then if it's actually good, there is progress, and if not then it can provably fail and either be improved or written off; also progress. So all together: do itttt. How it'll be funded... yeah. Hopefully with some common sense.
reply