pull down to refresh

I suppose it is risky for them to go overtly political. They can and should accept sats, both to appeal to the BTC crowd as well as practical benefits. But political statements (which quotes by Hayek can be interpreted as) would risk alienation of part of the population as well.
I would also be curious to know, if anyone has the answers
  • roughly what percentage of their revenue comes from BTC transactions
  • whether any specific state has higher/lower BTC transaction volume compared to national average
  • are they holding the BTC as asset? Or doing live conversion via an intermediary?