reply on: 0=1, Prove me wrong \ stacker news ~science

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @istealcheetos OP 17 Jun \ parent \ on: 0=1, Prove me wrong science

nope, no new term was introduced, the negative sign is just taken as common leaving the first term as is

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 17 Jun

1-(1-1+1-1+\dots) = 0

Isn't this equation wrong?

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @istealcheetos OP 17 Jun

How? Just appearing on the equation at first glance will make that seem wrong if you don't follow the previous steps :) That's not the breaking point

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 17 Jun

1-(0) = 0

21 sats \ 4 replies \ @istealcheetos OP 17 Jun

let me explain, it was 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1 - 1..... So I kept the first 1, then took the negative sign common for the rest eg 8 - 3 - 5 = 0 or 8 - (3 + 5) = 0 It might look illusionary lol