pull down to refresh

Ah, feels like forever since I last did an update. SN must be dead (and boring?)

Bet itself is getting more and more unexciting by the minute, that's for sure. The bet is sooo in the money: 0.29 for the 1.5m one, and 0.34 for the 1.4m one — hashtag mispricing (#1005689). The betting folk are coming around to my view, too, which is why the contracts trade at the prices they trade.

I'm not even the top No shareholder anymore, having taken some profits as the price has gone up (down). There are all manner of chances that @ek or @koob come up with some devilish plan to rug us No men, so I'm wary of my precious sats.

At some I'll just take my sats profits and go venture them somewhere elseAt some I'll just take my sats profits and go venture them somewhere else

Anyway, the shape of the graph is the saaaame. 2-week daily number is 891 — the second-lowest we've seen all year. For the year as a whole we've averaged 1,057 items, which is still a far cry from the 1,550 or so we need daily to hit the 1.4m mark. Relatively, we're the worst ever (at 67.90%).

Here's the most refreshing take, which may make me go risk some more sats: We need 1,974 a day for the rest of the year. That is: Even a successful ek-style insanity — which, if you remember, added roughly a 1,000 extra items a day for little over a week — EVERY WEEK for the rest of the year won't cut it.

The bet is over.

Gonna be the sweetest sats I ever made.


Some prev bet updates: #900000, #914289, #981289, #967744

112 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 15 Jun

I would bet but I prefer to zap

reply

Nice chart. Would be a shame if anything happened to it

reply
102 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 15 Jun
The bet is over.

Gonna be the sweetest sats I ever made.

oh my sweet summer child

reply

lol

There are more ek stunts coming?? Oh boi

reply

We call this win-win

reply

woaaaah, @ek spotting us again? My god, lovely:

first thought: of course the shark @Undisciplined was there, eating. second though: no, he was just arbing the two trades.

reply

He had already made his purchase by the time I read your post.

reply