Thanks for your insights here. I'm sure no bill gets this far without a lot of wrangling and changes.

My concern is not so much with the qualification, but with the door it opens for implementation.

It feels to me like this law leaves it pretty wide open for law makers to interpret this as: citizens may self custody if they do it the way we tell them (so we can ensure they aren't sending it to ISIS).

Finally, I'd note that neither the first nor second amendments felt the need to say that their respective rights were protected...except when people committed crimes with speech or guns.