This is the right question. Most don’t want full sovereignty they want just enough to escape inflation or censorship, but not enough to feel the weight of responsibility. But that’s fine. Bitcoin doesn’t need mass sovereignty it just needs a critical minority that insists on it. The rest will free ride on the work of node runners, devs, miners, and plebs who care more about freedom than convenience. Sovereignty isn’t all or nothing it’s an asymmetric weapon. Even if 99% use custodial wallets, the 1% who don’t still define the credible threat that keeps the whole system honest. Bitcoin gives us power. Most won’t use it, but the point is they can.