pull down to refresh

But that analogy isn’t correct. Not only does it falsely imply that the expansion of the universe started from a single spot, which it didn’t, but it also suggests that the galaxies are the things that are moving, which isn’t entirely accurate.
It’s not so much the galaxies that are moving away from each other – it’s the space between galaxies, the fabric of the universe itself, that’s ever-expanding as time goes on. In other words, it’s not really the galaxies themselves that are moving through the universe; it’s more that the universe itself is carrying them farther away as it expands.
The term Bing Bang was surely poorly coined, contributing to this misconception...
[...]
So asking, “Where’s the center of the universe?” is somewhat like asking, “Where’s the center of the balloon’s surface?” There simply isn’t one. You could travel along the surface of the balloon in any direction, for as long as you like, and you’d never once reach a place you could call its center because you’d never actually leave the surface.
In the same way, you could travel in any direction in the universe and would never find its center because, much like the surface of the balloon, it simply doesn’t have one.
reply
"Not only does it falsely imply that the expansion of the universe started from a single spot, which it didn’t"... How do you know ?
"It’s not so much the galaxies that are moving away from each other " But i thought, the Universe and the galaxies that are moving ?
“Where’s the center of the universe?” We do not know much... so may be! -Universe is a ballon ? May be it s something else!
reply
Wait, did you even read your own link?
reply
yes i did, but you seems to be so sur of you as you were astrophysicist or i do not know....
reply
Well, if you did read it, you'd know that I was just quoting what OP wrote in the article you shared. OP is an astrophysicist.
reply
it was just to suggest other questions ("you" was in general not you)