If we’re truly being honest about what’s going on here it's not about jpegs or inscriptions or fake keys. It’s about power, control, and narrative. Some folks want Bitcoin to be 'pristine' sound money, others see it as immutable digital stone. But introducing consensus changes (whether via soft fork or hard fork) to police intent is a dangerous game. What we're witnessing isn't spam, it's adversarial behavior testing protocol resilience. The UTXO bloat issue is genuine. But is the solution really to compromise on immutability and ossification for edge case 'cleanliness'? That seems like a net negative. Bitcoin should absorb chaos, not flinch at it. Maybe the real fix isn’t a fork it’s better fee markets and stronger node incentives. Because once we start drawing moral lines in consensus sand, we’ve already lost the plot