pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious OP 11 Jun \ parent \ on: Other clients are a menace bitcoin
lol, fiat statist. I’m quoting Satoshi by the way. He said “menace”. I guess Satoshi was a fiat statist then.
Satoshi was a benevolent dictator. He was respected and trusted to have the last word over what was merged. But he left, and we are now on our own.
And his software wasn't named "Bitcoin Core". It was just "Bitcoin". The "Core" developers started naming themselves and their software "Bitcoin Core" long after Satoshi had left.
reply
Yes, all true. I don’t think this fundamentally changes that Bitcoin Core, the codebase today, is the codebase started by Satoshi and the one implementation of Bitcoin. If one wants to run a Bitcoin node, one runs the Satoshi client.
reply
I haven't read the code, but I'm sure that Knots' latest version's code is way more similar to Core's latest version than Core's latest version to Bitcoin's code written during the Satoshi era.
So let's not scare people from running whatever software they deem appropriate. Calling Core "the one" doesn't give it magical properties.
And, again, I am not vouching for Knots. Solely stating that Core doesn't and shouldn't have a monopoly over what bitcoin is.
reply
It absolutely does have a “monopoly” of what Bitcoin is. It’s not even a monopoly — it just is. Bitcoin Core is Bitcoin. Knots isn’t Bitcoin, it’s a Bitcoin flavored troll client.
No we really do need to scare people away from bad clients, or at least warn them of the risks. We have the benefit of hindsight. I saw the same with Bcash.
reply
Bcash has different consensus rules. The consensus rules are the same in knots.
reply
Your appeals to authority are the most un-bitcoin-like thing in this thread.
reply
Heh, the paradox of authority.
It’s not about him as an authority, but someone with experience and wisdom to know better.
reply