pull down to refresh

There’s a huge difference between allowing relay operators to define what content they want to host and being pro-censorship. Being decentralized by design already means anyone can create and maintain a relay, which completely invalidates the use of the term “pro-censorship.” It’s a poor word choice and was clearly intended to spark controversy by framing the text in a biased way.

reply
55 sats \ 6 replies \ @Car 10 Jun

soo tldr? nostr is relay first, relays choose what to censor not user first

reply

Unless you run your own or a more permissible relay and clients allow people to read your notes from there.

reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Car 10 Jun

soo clients have the option/or not to offer your relay to its users

reply

Yes, as fj says at the end.

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Car 11 Jun

fiatjaf is fj does he go by that now? is that a thing

reply

Nah just my thing

reply

deleted by author

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 10 Jun

This will trigger people :)

reply

I think that's the point and a good point imo.

reply
38 sats \ 3 replies \ @rblb 10 Jun

not your relay not your free speech

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Car 10 Jun

makes sense or they can just go elsewhere and not get censored, thats why that aspect never made sense for me, falls flat in a post trump era, it was always about the zaps that got me to nostr

reply
7 sats \ 1 reply \ @rblb 11 Jun

I was just memeing. At some point nostr will have some more direct or indirect replication going on, and thanks to the messy nature of the p2p internet, your notes will eventually reach everyone, no matter where you post them.

It is being used only at 10% of its full potential.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 11 Jun

haha, you got me

reply