Trump’s complaints about Russia’s behavior belies a deeper reality: the conflict’s resolution will be forged through combat, not compromise. The president’s remarks reflect a disjointed foreign policy. Despite his calls for peace and his professed desire to mediate the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, the Trump administration’s actions in 2025 have not matched the rhetoric of de-escalation.
It’s ultimately the actions, not the rhetoric that counts. The United States continues to supply military aid, intelligence, and logistical support to Ukraine, despite all the talk coming from Trump about ending this conflict. The United States refuses to recognize any Russian sphere of influence in Eastern Europe or to accommodate Moscow’s broader security concerns, a position that has become a major obstacle to any meaningful peace settlement.
Further, recent Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian airfields mark a significant escalation in the conflict. On June 1, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) launched 117 drones deep into Russian territory, targeting military aircraft at five separate military bases. The operation, dubbed “Spider’s Web,” reportedly destroyed or severely damaged dozens of aircraft, including several critical A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft and nuclear-capable bombers.
These attacks exposed vulnerabilities in Russia’s strategic deterrent and demonstrated Ukraine’s growing capacity for long-range, high-impact strikes. The use of inexpensive, commercially available drones—often re-purposed for military objectives—has fundamentally altered the nature of the battlefield. That said, such attacks are largely facilitated by the top-notch intelligence that the United States and its NATO allies provide to Ukraine. Though framed as an independent defender against Russian might, Ukraine effectively operates as a NATO proxy, sustained by extensive Western military aid and intelligence. …
In sum, the Russia-Ukraine conflict is unlikely to be resolved at the negotiating table as long as the United States maintains its quest for global hegemony. The outsourcing of the war to allies and private contractors, the escalation of drone warfare, and the entrenched maximalist positions on both sides have created a situation in which only military force can determine the outcome.
Russia, pushed to the brink by decades of Western encroachment and repeated diplomatic betrayals, is prepared to escalate the conflict until its objectives are met or the Ukrainian military collapses. Ukraine, backed by Western support and emboldened by recent tactics successes, will continue to resist, consequences be damned.
So long as the United States seeks dominance and Russia remains capable, war—not diplomacy—will shape Ukraine’s future. The conflict shows no sign of abating, with peace distant and continued suffering certain.
Yes, the war will go on until the Russians take over Ukrainian territory that they wish to take. DJT’s willful hypocrisy is what is driving the war to further stages and will mean the total loss of the Khazarian Ukrainian homeland. As long as DJT is supporting the Khazarians Ukrainians with war supplies, intelligence and, apparently, troops on the ground to operate the sophisticated weaponry being used against Russia, I don’t think the Russians will either stop or put up with it. And, once they prove direct involvement by NATO OTAN militaries or countries, the worst will happen to them, too. Why doesn’t DJT just prove that he really means it by withdrawing all support from the Khazarians Ukrainians?