pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @gregtonoski OP 31 Jan \ parent \ on: Call for nodes reconfiguration: minrelaytxfee=0.00000001 bitcoin_Mining
The assumption that a transaction would have never got confirmed is incorrect.
Miners are of tertiary importance here (if any). The setting is applied by node runners and affects nodes in the first place.
As a side note, consider also setting
incrementalrelayfee=0
instead of the default 3000 in order to relay replacement transactions which fee-rates don't change.Transaction fee is quoted in natural numbers, e.g. 97 sats for a transaction. A fee-rate sat/vbyte is derivative and doesn't exist on the chain. There isn't any rounding problem.
Noobs mistakenly think that they have much more time, e.g. to create backup copy of secrets, improve security, stack more, learn more, verify etc.
"Indeed, in May 2014, Ahlgren had blogged about his knowledge of mixers as ways to add anonymity to bitcoin transactions."
It suggests he should have blogged about a boating accident instead.
So Jack talked about TRON/USDT: "I will die on this hill" https://youtu.be/_59hrgTiRJU?t=1045
Maybe Bitcoin is not suitable for immediate spending (in your situation) and could be scrapped/avoided. Instead, all the focus could be put on long-term storage (which is assumed to be of the utmost importance).
Darthcoin is friendly and gives valuable advices. I wish they were more direct and "toxic" in a Bitcoiners way.
None. Security of storage is all yours responsibility. It can't be outsourced. "Wallets" are for convenience, e.g. ease of signing a transaction.