pull down to refresh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c6b0/1c6b0429b43f9f57677c640d95aa0f2e42ed12a8" alt=""
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ealvar26 21 Feb \ on: Do you know of any sports competition where the prize is Bitcoin? Stacker_Sports
Hey have you seen the workit app? They do workout challenges with bitcoin prizes.
Also, I believe there are surf competitions in El Salvador with bitcoin prizes. When I was in El Zonte I watched one. I don't know how widespread that is though.
Bien cool le enviamos unos sats de bienvenida. Q cool q puedo hacer esto de Puerto Rico a Cuba sin preocupación y en segundos. Adelante bitcoin
I think it's a great point. People who post things like "shitcoiner" in response to a thoughtful post are committing a logical fallacy and their arguments are null.
I also agree with the definition of shill.
Not respecting the ideas of others and judging things not by merit is where maximalism falls down.
Seems like an end to end encrypted, open source relay - client combo might address the data collection concern.
This is a really cool idea. I pay for a vps and VPN with bitcoin regularly. Would be awesome if I could setup a subscription - but on my side!
Ha have you replayed it lately? It's still excellent and quite politically incorrect. I bet they would sanitize it 😅😬
This is really cool. Dates as block heights would be a cool addition.
Question: isn't Litecoin and dogecoin also Bitcoin forks?
This is an interesting question. Probably a state that is restricted enough to be considered socialist will never "work" in the long run imo.
But I can't see why it wouldn't be theoretically possible? Right I mean they just couldn't print money but that isn't a core definition of socialism.
Interesting case! Wouldn't it be cool to know an "optimum taxation level" but I guess there's a billion variables and we may never.
Definitely true but I'm not sure that absolves us of designing and maintaining effective systems when there is a need for them. I believe this example of environmental regulation fits this case and there is a lot of historical and contemporary evidence to support this.
I've thought about this problem a lot and I think environmental damage is a uniquely good example of the need for regulation of the free market.
I realize the idea isn't perfect. But there is environmental damage that our technology doesn't have the means to fix. Therefore even if we punish wrongdoers we still end up with environmental damage.
Therefore I think there is a case for proactive measures, such as regulation, inspection and enforcement versus reactive measures like suing or jailing wrongdoers after the fact.
Wow thoughtful post and great title.
I also agree that tax is not theft. Everyone enjoys the benefit of public works, the military and civil service. If it were optional to pay for this we'd have tons of freeloaders and we would all suffer.
It's all about balance though. If there is too much taxation or redistribution then the whole economy breaks down and that's shit for everyone.
It's really cool! Do you have an invite code for testing @Rsync25 ?