pull down to refresh
Oh, I didn't notice that it's a editable text, the weak border confused me!
A list with dedicated add/remove button would be a better solution.
By the way, you should automatically retrieve and use my Blossom media server fetching kind:10063 (https://github.com/hzrd149/blossom/blob/master/buds/03.md).
Same for NIP-96, you have kind:10096.
So you should check the presence of these events and according set the default media server type, using the correct value (if both are present I would suggest using Blossom as default).
Very cool!
Some UX suggestions:
- Improve the onboarding showing a modal explaining what the service does
- Simply the interface moving the quick status on the top, in a more compact form
- When saving a draft, don't remove it from the composer, often the user just want to backup what is writing
- When a draft is used, completed and sent, remove it from the recent drafts (or at least propose it interactively)
- Disable buttons that have a not applicable action in that context, instead of returning a "nothing to do" message (e.g. saving a draft with an empty editor)
- Offer a light theme option
- Add the github repo to the page footer
- Add you npub to the page footer
Publishing to NIP-65 relays should be the default, why forcing the reccomanded?
Really important feature request: use user's Blossom server for uploads
So how this timeframe is selected? 24h standard?
From the "grouped" settings:
just add a tooltip on mouse over
Now there is an hover that changes the bg color; I also tried to expand the button as "See all XX", but it's ugly. A tooltip is useful, but if immediate is annoying on the long term, with a little delay can be missed. Maybe a good solution is to show immediately the tooltip on a single row, until the user actually click the counter, discovering what it means.
The total count of users' notes in the selected timeframe, if you click it it shows you them.
I know it's not the best UI, I'm thinking how to make it more clear.
I'm glad you like it.
If you want to browse relays just do that ("favorite relays" section exist exactly for this, but you can also browse them directly). You don't need to add them to your "read and write relays" configuration, it's useless; this latter section is useful only for the following scenario.
You can see Nostr as you prefer, but it was originally created to replace Twitter, so the following paradigm necessarily exists. Btw, following is just a facilitator filter, like the one a relay can implement to avoid saving trash/OT/spam, so you can happily browse it.
This also is a thing from the original Jumble.
You can have how many relays you want, this is just discouraged, and for a good reason. A "plain" outbox model can be really expensive with many relays, and often users add them blindly to achieve a better visibility, without really understand what the config means.
Fevela/Jumble have a kind of algorithm to manage this, so a long list doesn't actually have a negative impact, but it remains a good best practices.
it doesn't give me option to select my selection of relays, it shows only the "favorite" ones
You can freely pick what relays post to from your preferred list:
Relay browsing is a core Jumble's feature, credits to https://njump.me/npub1syjmjy0dp62dhccq3g97fr87tngvpvzey08llyt6ul58m2zqpzps9wf6wl
I think that relay browsing paired with grouped notes paradigm unlock an interesting user experience!
I needed to take a look at some live logs and quickly analyze some old ones, but I couldn't find anything effective to highlight terms, except for esoteric sed and awk commands.
So I built ch - Colored Highlighter - a simple terminal tool to highlight specific words in your command output with colors. Perfect for tailing logs, debugging, and making command output more readable.
Try it out, all feedback is welcome!
We are working on first Frostr signing integration with nip46 right now.
https://nstart.me has already been doing this for months.
But we need more projects on this direction, so good!
https://nostr.band/?q=trending+by%3Anpub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5
^^^ There is a bug, this should point to:
https://nostr.band/?q=trending+by%3Anpub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5Primal is not Nostr.
If you have been following the discussions over the past few days, there have been many jokes and memes about this Primal's weird trending list.
It depends on the client you choose to use.
The basic Nostr algorithm is no algorithm, or better you are the algorithm, so you just get a feed of who you actively follow.
Apps can then have different built-in logics to help discoverability (e.g. using your web of trust, or the most reacted/zapped content) or let you explore different external DVM (data vending machine, that actually are algorithms).
It depends on the meaning of "trust".
For example talking about impersonator, you trust someone to be "real", even if you don't agree with his positions or you don't trust what he says.
WoT could work better if you follow people you actually fully trust, and put in separate lists people you want to monitor for other purposes.
No, the problem is that you are trusting an algorithm that say you what is trending.
Great!