codengo

nostr

The `nostr` protocol offers multiple options for long format contents (using NIP23) here the options found:

- https://habla.news (the best from my experience)
- https://blogstack.io
- https://wikistr.com aiming to replace the other Wiki
- https://yakihonne.com (post tagged/branded)

also found some tools:
- https://highlighter.com a reader to save and refer highlignts and quotes as nostr notes
- https://migrate.nostr.com that helps convert posts in NIP23s
- https://nosli.vercel.app to create curated lists notes into a NIP23s

...and probably many more will pop up soon!

Substack & Medium sucks! An invite to move your contents over Nostr platforms

nostr as a replacement for a database

0313029d5d

🙏 Thank you SN Givers! Without you it wouldn't be possible

bitcoin

Looking to have some input in finding valid alternatives to Google services, Youtube is one of the first polatform I'd like to replace. there's any valid alterative that can compare profits? How do you strategize around moving the community form YT to the new one?

I've found this option but I'd like more suggestions:

**PeerTube**.tv: enable a great V4V approach and apparently there is no advertisement system built in to the software like with Youtube. But you can... Find a sponsor yourself and embed their pitch into your content. This guy talk about a [plugin with the Hive](https://www.reddit.com/r/PeerTube/comments/pzgjcx/monetize_your_peertube_instance_with_the_hive/) network? Maybe is possible to integrate Bitcoin somehow in PeerTube with a similar plugin? 

**Patreon**.com works, but only fiat. I might find an audience willing to donate directly by bitcoin or sats and cut out the middleman.

I also heard about Odysee.com, joinPeertube.org and BitChute.com, 

Another great one to keep staking sats is fountain.fm but does not allow video yet

Just wondering if you have any other suggestion or alternative from personal experience.
 
From the other side, any other podcast management and music and entertainment management please mention below

Thank you

Valid alternatives for YouTubers to monetize

deleted by author

Considering Bitcoin Core code ossification is the process of making the Bitcoin Core code more stable and resistant to change and it will help to ensure the long-term security and stability of the Bitcoin network.

There are a number of reasons why Bitcoin Core code ossification is important.

**Security**: A stable and unchanging code is less likely to contain security vulnerabilities. This is because there are fewer opportunities for attackers to exploit bugs or flaws in the code.
**Stability**: A stable and unchanging code is less likely to cause unexpected changes to the Bitcoin network. This is important for businesses and users who rely on Bitcoin to function reliably.
**Efficiency**: A stable and unchanging code can be more efficient to run and maintain. This is because there is no need to constantly update the code, which can be time-consuming and expensive.

The Bitcoin Core code ossification process is gradual and ongoing. It is not possible to say exactly when it will be complete. However, it is likely that the process will be accelerated once 98% of the Bitcoin supply has been mined, which is expected to happen in 2030.

There are a number of arguments for and against waiting until 2140, when the last Bitcoin will be mined, to complete the Bitcoin Core code ossification process.

Arguments for waiting until 2140:
Waiting until 2140 would ensure that the Bitcoin Core code is ossified for the longest possible period of time.
Waiting until 2140 would allow for more time to test and refine the ossification process.
Waiting until 2140 would allow for more time to develop alternative solutions to Bitcoin Core, such as alternative implementations of the Bitcoin protocol.
Arguments against waiting until 2140:
Waiting until 2140 would leave the Bitcoin network vulnerable to security vulnerabilities for a longer period of time.
Waiting until 2140 would make it more difficult to make changes to the Bitcoin protocol, which could be necessary to address future challenges.
Waiting until 2140 would make it more difficult to attract new users to Bitcoin, as they may be concerned about the long-term security of the network.

Ultimately, the decision of when and if to complete the Bitcoin Core code ossification process is a complex one. There are a number of factors to consider, and there is no easy answer yet.

💡 idea: Let's ossify the code on 2140, when last "hafin" will be confirmed!

https://twitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1698321426959245361

![](https://snipboard.io/xeCKvE.jpg)

`https://twitter.com/WatcherGuru/status/1698321426959245361`