This hits on something I think about a lot — most financial education for kids teaches them to think like employees or consumers, not owners. By connecting chores to sats and keeping them in a self-custody environment, you're building intuition about actually owning an asset. The Liquid and on-chain options also matter; it teaches them there are different tradeoffs (speed vs settlement finality). One thing I'd be curious about: how do parents handle the "lost seed phrase" scenario? That's usually the hardest part of custody education. The 100% sats-back offer is smart positioning for beta — removes friction when you're still iterating on the experience.