pull down to refresh
1100 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitcoin_minimalist 10 Dec \ on: [Logic Puzzle] Chinese Dumplings science
Let's call the guys A, B, C and D, with A to take first.
If N = 1, A loses immediately (he has to be rude)
If N = 2,3 or 4, he will take N-1 and B loses.
If N = 5,6 or 7, A will take 3, B will take N-4 and C loses.
If N = 8,9 or 10, A and B will each take 3, C will take N-7 and D loses.
If N = 11, A will lose whatever he does (after his turn, it's the same situation as for N = 8,9 or 10, with the players shifted by one).
If N = 12,13 or 14, A takes 1,2 and 3, respectively, so that 11 dumplings are left and B will lose. (If he takes too many, e.g. N=12 and he takes 2, it will again be the situation above with A in the losing seat.)
If N = 15,16 or 17, A will take 3 and B will act as above, so in the end C loses.
If N = 18,19 or 20, A and B take 3, C takes 1,2 or 3 respectively and D loses.
If N = 21, it's the same situation as for N = 11 again, A loses whatever he does.
And so on. In summary, the current business man:
- loses anyway if N = 1 mod 10
- should take 1 if N = 2 mod 10
- should take 2 if N = 3 mod 10
- should take 3 otherwise.
Alright, sent you 1M sats :)
No need to send anything back, I don't really need those testnet coins anymore.
Not sure yet if I will make it today, a bit busy this weekend. Maybe I'll manage to join part of the tournament. If not, have fun and I'll hopefully join the next one!
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitcoin_minimalist 22 Jun \ parent \ on: Stacker News Chess Tournament?! Stacker_Sports
Thanks! Yes, I've been lurking from time to time so far, but finally decided to sign-up :)
Interested to join. I'm a reasonably strong chess player, but still well blow master level (this is my lichess profile).
Though I personally don't like correspondence games, mostly because it's too easy to cheat there (using an engine). Would be happy to play any real-time (e.g. blitz or rapid) time control.
GENESIS