pull down to refresh
Maybe it's just a French thing. They collect donated food from producers/supermarkets etc. And sell it for cheap to those not earning not. For normal earners, prices are normal so money earnt by them can go into buying bigger quantities to have more cheap stuff for the main users
I have been talking food wanted from a solidarity grocery store for a bot more than à year.
What is given to them and that they can't sell cheap for those who need ot because it's too old, I tool home everyday my job allowed me to go there after work. We're talking about 30 kg per day, 2 to 3 times a day
Then I do compost it in the garden. Eventually, even that quantity degrades fast enough that the compost pile decreases as fast as you add to it.
But be sure to not have a single one, a wide enough one, and to turn it often BEFORE it starts to smell!
Be aware of rats too. At some point, one had digged tunnels to go from the food garden to inside the compost
Now, the second compost pile is more open and a lot more wide, and I see some birds pick in it. Sometimes the dears.And I guess at some point I will also see wils boars, but it is far enough in the forest part of the garden
Hey,
What's up with the sudden lightning node liquidity decrease, and website being offline? I hope you are fine?
Woops, you made me realize my script always set the negative inbound fee to -1. Now the discount can go further. So, thanks!
Well, I do update my channels' max htlc size depending on my available liquidity. Is that what you mean?
For me, it has 2 advantages:
-For the network: nodes only attempt payments through me when I advertise I have the available liquidity. The don't lose any routing attempts because of me.
-For me, it fees like I don't get 'blacklisted' by pathfinding algorithms anymore, since most nodes never 'fail' to route through me often enough
Well, i do use negative inbound fees in my own script that periodically updates my channel's fees. I would say it helped organic rebalancing for me. Not sure i have more to add to the subject.
I see 10096 is merged, but not 10033. For those still with 0.18.5, would you recommend updating to 0.19.3 or not yet?
Thanks for sharing this! I thought of doing something similar for my node, but my numbers are far lower than you.
One question I would have is, did you at some point consider moving to cln for performance reasons? And why did you not?
I think at some point the owner of zerofeerouting sais he had had too, for the size of logs alone (but as far as I know, this has been improved in LND).
Slide 21 of 'what is bitcoin' has 7 seed words in the background of the video, but those are probably unrelated
I tried a script looping for combinations that start with abstract and end with those, but stopped after a while of not finding any combination where the last word would be a correct checksum of the rest
On the cold wallets slide, there is a qr code that outputs the first part of something encoded in 'universal resources' format. But I couldn't find anywhere the second part
The real path to the slide is at the end of the video where nixon talks. There is a spider/bat that appears and you get there if you click on it
How often will that 1M product be bought?
Do not forget that for you to be able to receive 1M, the other side of the channel has to have 1M of his sats stuck in the channel.
They must have an interest to keep it that way (bigger channel with not everything on their side, open for routing that brings them some fee,..)
I'm ok with it not being optional (although even zeus allows to not provide one!), but i would like it to at least accept the self signed tls.cert of my LND node. Right now, this gitves a 'self signed' error in the SN logs, and my LND node gets the similar error that remote rejected it.
Is there a real reason to not accept self signed certificate of LND instead of having to provide a 'trusted' one?
I mean, worst case, if I did not give a safe certificate, AND some one spoofed my node's IP, they would receive my zaps. I should be able to accept that risk?
There's no real risk for SN, or is there?
Choose channels that bring routing in both directions. Channels that bring no routing are useless, (if your goal is a routing node) and channels that bring a lot of traffic in only one direction will require rebalancing, which has a cost
Update channel fees to favor both directon on all channels :
Update fee policy to not have max htlc size greater than your channel capacity. It might leak a bit of info about your channel balance, but will avoid useless attempts for other nodes, so you will get less blacklisted as a node that always fails attempts
Update this on your channel quite often, but not too often, to not be considered a spaming node and get banned. Say, at most a single update of all channel policies per day, and up to 3 individual updates for a few selected channels if really needed?
Personally, i do this by a python script that is run regularly through lncli. to update channel policies
And i have my ugly free channel advisor at lnshortcut.xyz to suggest me nodes to connect to (i am in the progress of publishing sources, coming shortly)
One thing i know i am not good at is being greedy. My channel fee rule is basically '1ppm pr 1M of channel capacity'. So even my biggest 16m channel, when fee rules mentionned above allow, is only at 16 sats per million sat routed..
But hey, at least i earn slightly more than occasional channel close fees and have no rebalancing costs
And obsiously yes, as @DarthCoin said, you probably have to low capacity for now to see anything substantially flow (for me, it was at about 0.7BTC of capacity?)