The version 1.7 improved a lot and has an additionals quality measurement. The Shannon metric has it now sitting well above 250 bits

It's a firt version, but yes I would use it, offline of course.

most generators out there (including these that are sold as part of a service) are just a 1000 iteration AES with no salting. I've built something that I would use yes. I think no one should use hardware wallet "secure" elements where the user doesn't even know what algo is use or what hashing. With my code, you can see everything, and you run it offline if you like (best practice).

maybe :) - I think it can be used on any network of course, but the restriction of 80 bytes makes my tool excellent to send a specific type of messages over it, and this way you can do it more compact. It will help, I'm sure.

tip: enable sending email, and ask 20 sats or whatever per email... would deter spammers and has a cool ring to it

he's captured by the suits imho

Shows one of the main issues in Lighting:

I stay more and more away from it tbh. Too complex, too unreliable still after 7 years.