pull down to refresh
@Scroogey
51,359 sats stacked
stacking since: #85448longest cowboy streak: 5 verified stacker.news contributor
159 sats \ 7 replies \ @Scroogey 6h \ on: Today I Learned that the Laffer Curve Napkin Is on Display in the Smithsonian econ
Am I the only one who thinks he should have swapped the axes? Don't you usually use the x-axis for the parameter you adjust?
If you build the binary using guix, its SHA256 checksum should match what's in the SHA256SUMS file.
SHA256SUMS.asc contains the signatures of the developers attesting SHA256SUM is correct.
Without using guix, i.e. just the normal build procedure, you usually get a different binary every time you build it.
A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that encompasses a star and captures a large percentage of its power output. The concept is a thought experiment that attempts to imagine how a spacefaring civilization would meet its energy requirements once those requirements exceed what can be generated from the home planet's resources alone. Because only a tiny fraction of a star's energy emissions reaches the surface of any orbiting planet, building structures encircling a star would enable a civilization to harvest far more energy.
If we’re going to use chips in that package, we need to spread that heat. Roughly speaking, we need to spread the heat from a 1cm2 area to a 80cm2, or a circle with a radius of 5cm2.
That's a factor of 80, how do you get 6400?
Of course, correlation does not imply causation.
Notably, the socialists lost the finish civil war, and losing a civil war could very well cause intergenerational downward mobility.
Is there a similar analysis of the US civil war? What would it show about the mobility of that losing side?
Anyway, basing it on names is interesting!
So there exists anger without self-righteousness? Then self-righteousness can't be the defining characteristic of anger.
(I'm not arguing petty anger doesn't exist or isn't the most common, or shouldn't be kept in check after having considered self-righteousness, btw.)
Doesn't self-righteousness have clearly negative connotations? From Wikipedia
Self-righteousness is an attitude and belief of moral superiority derived from a person deeming their own beliefs, actions, or affiliations to be of greater virtue than those of the average person.
If, as in the example, a person sees an animal being mistreated, and considers that an unacceptable injustice, and feels anger, motivating them to intervene, you'd call that self-righteous? Because the person believes they are morally superior due to their belief in animal rights? While, in fact, the average person would not agree?
Perceiving injustice is usually self-righteousness?
Some say a complete lack of anger is a deficiency, inirascibility.
It seems easy to prevent for Coinbase.
But what if you get a sign-up from a small local business in Uruguay, from domain xcoffee.com.uy for string "XCoffee" with logo "XCoffee"? You check DNS ownership automatically, email, external SSO, etc. Great.
You even have an employee check their web site and check the string and logo. Fine.
But what you don't know is that there is a real local business called XCoffee with that logo operating, but on domain x-cafe.com.uy, and the request is coming from someone targeting their customers.
How will you prevent that, without hiring hundreds of human investigators as you scale?
DNS registrars have the same problem (if they even try), it's not easily solved.