my boys already do it, I just need to join up. but i agree, the community seems really good.

Woah! I've been working myself up to do jiu jitsu with my boys, but I just know I'm gonna tear something and majorly regret it.

This looks like a wonderful place to visit. I hear about Hungary with some regularity, but Slovakia doesn't come up as much for me. I would love to visit someday!

If someone is able to put words in an order that sets my soul to singing, I don't care how they arrived at it -- unless they got it from someone else and are acting like it is their own.

If llms can be prompted to produce truly insightful writing that changes how I understand the world and the colors I see, then the prompters are welcome to the credit of such writing (because it certainly isn't a one-shot right now and requires thought to make it produce insight).

Given the trajectory of llms, it is likely they will in short order be producing writing that is very difficult to distinguish from genuinely thoughtful writing. It may still be slop, but it will be well-hidden slop -- which is to say it will not be so different from most of the writing currently produced by humans.

If, however, llms get to the point where very little prompting is required to open new fields of discovery in my mind, then we are confronted with a new problem: are such models deserving of some sort of status beyond a dumb tool?

If it is a problem for a person to post llm writing without attribution, it means llms are more than a dumb tool. There has to be a person to whom the attribution needs to be made.

This, for me, is the core of the debate: are llms a tool or are they an entity? If tool, no attribution necessary -- if an entity, attribution should be made - but also !!!!!!

Now I'm curious about BONESAW.

People talk about llms "trying" to do this or "intending" that, but isn't it kind of like calling evolution "natural selection"? There never was any intention in the selection, no choice being made. Rather, just the outcome as a result of that particular mix of circumstances. Survival of the fittest: we get the responses that match the circumstances.

I forget to read him until every once in a while I check back in and binge. makes me want to write better (and more).

++++++++++=++++=+=++++++++++++ +=+++++++=+=+#@%@#+++++++++++ ++++=+=+++%@@#@@@@@@%%@=+=+++++ +=======%%@#+##%@@@@@@@@@+===+++ =======##---:-=+#@@@@@@@#===== ====-=#@+=---::-=+##@@@@@@@+=+== -+==-%%+--:----===**%@@@@@@++* ----#@#===---++++#@@@@@@@%** ===+#%@@@@-##@@@%#@@@@@@##%# ##+#@@=--====---++%@@@@@@@%## %%%@%@%@-----+====#@@@@@@@@## %%@%@@@@+=#@@=++%%@@@@@@@@@%@ @@@@%@%@#+**+##%++#%@@@@@@@@@%% %@%%%@@@@#+++#**#%@@@@@@@@@%#@ %%%%%@@@@@@#=+#%%%@@@@@@@@@@@%% ###@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@% ####@@@@@@@@+##%###@@@@@@@@%

hmmmm....copy paste did not go as expected. This was supposed to be mona.

looking forward to seeing what the muse brings out!

I pay for chat and here's what it produced when I prompted"draw me an ascii bitcoin logo"

    ______
 .-'      '-.

.' '. / O O
: : | \ / | : '.__.' : \ / '. .' '-.____.-'

  BITCOIN ₿

But that aside, I thought we kind of established that the labor theory of value is a no go...

I can sketch okay, but using gimp I can do things way prettier. the tool let's me create visuals that I have no hope of creating with my hands. why is ai different? OP came up with a concept, if ai helped make get it out of OP's head and into reality, what's wrong with that?

That's pretty good.

Oof. That hurts. When I lost my hat after my original run, it was very difficult to get back to a long run.

I've been thinking about writing about homeschooling, and considered putting it in ~Education, but it would also kind of fit in a parenting territory.

Want to learn something about cloud seeding?

Terminator: I'll be back.

Stacker: only if you pay the 1000 sat posting fee.

Buttcoin used to be humorous, but now its just whiny.

Howdy!

This is super handy. Excellent.

Cool! ⚡

Hey! Great job! ⚡