0 sats \ 0 replies \ @MaaliMKen 9 Nov \ on: Bitcoin is the trust network bitcoin
Bitcoin is trust inscribed on all transactions in the record + 1 every 10 minutes.
No other money inscribes trust like this.
I've written this story this week - https://hackernoon.com/bitcoinized-fossil-fuel
Feedback will be appreciated.
I need help coding the server ip addresses so that player 1's IP address and player 2's IP address can be different without the game slowing down to less than a crawl (which is what happened when I used ngrok).
If you can code something faster without need for either player to pay rent to a host server for server.py to run in, I'll be grateful.
And will make you COO (I plan to make a business selling BTC nodes with node-games of this type to kids.
I honestly think this is the future of gaming.
After selling enough BTC nodes I plan to sell BTC nodes embedded inside Tennis rackets 🙂
Otherwise, yeah, I guess I have to pay server rent (but that isn't self-sovereign. I want maximum self-sovereignty)
Once you achieve the goal, run server.py and client.py and share with me what IP I should run with in my own client.py so that we sync.
Thereafter, we can play.
Hope to make this happen 💪
Hello @south_korea_ln, I actually coded my idea and made a video. Check it out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFZKtCXrkI
What do you think?
Here wondering how long my singular satoshi will take to pay back all those $34 trillion at that rate in the video :)
They exist in a superposition of positions :)
The way I like to understand it (possibly false analogy but bear with it) is that fundamentally, at the smallest scales, particle forces are probabilistically determined.
Force vectors thus randomly (probabilitically) pop in and out of existence through worm-hole-like portals as per the laws of quantum mechanics and these force vectors are what decay into particles and vice versa.
So depending on the conditions, these neutrons coud behave like quantum force-vector particles and vice versa.
Really I see it like multisig. You do it if you want to, and leave it if you don't.
I have no concrete idea yet of how it would be implemented, but I am willing to bet it is a swell idea worth pursuing, for technical and intellectual value.
You fail to realise Bitcoiners themselves, especially devs, do the interventionism.
Now dollar debt minimization is good if the close-door policy is aimed at boosting local consumption, growth and development. The Chinese have done this well and quite frankly, now, couldn't care less where the Federal debt winds blow.
Bitcoin has an elaborate concept of time. This can be the first step in the direction of a GPS protocol.
With location, that would be harder.
Perhaps if the BTC node was a geo satellite, then that nails the location aspect too.
So if some innovations are pro BTC ethos why bunch every build together into the Shitcoin camp?
People shilling frog JPEGs might be shitcoining, but Rodamor should be lauded for creating a form of uniqueness-ID for single satoshis. He is an OG. Usecase? No idea. Maybe in GTA 8 or some MMORPG or something.
Cool shit? Definitely.
Now my idea would be implemented by a community of Bitcoin devs say in SF, for themselves.
They geo-lock their coins, and supercharge silicon valley.
How would I benefit from that?
Absolutely no way, right.
Maybe get credit for a cool innovation. Like Rodamor.
"False belief in their value" is a tall order. Fiat may be broken, but people are not stupid.
If you have read the Fiat standard then you know Fiat has value.
Now let's not call people who create cool shit for / within Bitcoin shitcoiners. The ultimate shitcoinery is creating nothing for Bitcoin and blindly believing in NGU. That is what a ponzi scheme does, pure and simple.
Recruit people, price goes up from scarcity shock, dump and buy lambo.
Lol. So Ponzi. No wonder many smart people hate BTC + Crypto.
Bitcoin is not going to get far by simply preaching its speedy goodness. People need to interact more with the digital thing.