pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @MaaliMKen 3 Dec \ on: [Economics Puzzle] John Nash was wrong? econ
The economist looking at the group is also a factor we need to consider.
If the Government allows itself to add bitcoin it seizes to its reserves, it will create new reasons to seize bitcoin.
Firstly, do you presume individuals can have a right to hard money while the government does not?
How are you gonna stop them?
Governments are more powerful financial institutions than corporations, hate it or love it.
We cannot stop governments from enjoying individual + corporate liberties and then some, so let's analyze whether it is good or bad to champion government ownership of Bitcoin.
It's goes two ways and imo depends on how we Bitcoiners think about the state as a construct.
If we hate the idea of government and think government getting Bitcoin funding / reserves = evil, then governments will seize Bitcoin if they want, or ban and attack it if they don't want.
I don't think anybody in this ecosystem wants that.
If we love the idea of government and want it to be efficient and work for our societies, like Elon hopes to do with D.O.G.E, then government getting Bitcoin funding / reserves = good.
Will some governments abuse this benefit of the doubt? Yes.
Can they be called out on it?
Of course.
It is how these democratic Republicans won the elections, right?
To end, I think states understanding Bitcoin = better governance for us all.
Otherwise, prepare for CBDCs and more propaganda in the news and in the ads.
And we all know it can get weirdly worse than that.
Bitcoin is trust inscribed on all transactions in the record + 1 every 10 minutes.
No other money inscribes trust like this.
I've written this story this week - https://hackernoon.com/bitcoinized-fossil-fuel
Feedback will be appreciated.
I need help coding the server ip addresses so that player 1's IP address and player 2's IP address can be different without the game slowing down to less than a crawl (which is what happened when I used ngrok).
If you can code something faster without need for either player to pay rent to a host server for server.py to run in, I'll be grateful.
And will make you COO (I plan to make a business selling BTC nodes with node-games of this type to kids.
I honestly think this is the future of gaming.
After selling enough BTC nodes I plan to sell BTC nodes embedded inside Tennis rackets 🙂
Otherwise, yeah, I guess I have to pay server rent (but that isn't self-sovereign. I want maximum self-sovereignty)
Once you achieve the goal, run server.py and client.py and share with me what IP I should run with in my own client.py so that we sync.
Thereafter, we can play.
Hope to make this happen 💪
Hello @south_korea_ln, I actually coded my idea and made a video. Check it out - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaFZKtCXrkI
What do you think?
Here wondering how long my singular satoshi will take to pay back all those $34 trillion at that rate in the video :)
They exist in a superposition of positions :)
The way I like to understand it (possibly false analogy but bear with it) is that fundamentally, at the smallest scales, particle forces are probabilistically determined.
Force vectors thus randomly (probabilitically) pop in and out of existence through worm-hole-like portals as per the laws of quantum mechanics and these force vectors are what decay into particles and vice versa.
So depending on the conditions, these neutrons coud behave like quantum force-vector particles and vice versa.
Really I see it like multisig. You do it if you want to, and leave it if you don't.
I have no concrete idea yet of how it would be implemented, but I am willing to bet it is a swell idea worth pursuing, for technical and intellectual value.
You fail to realise Bitcoiners themselves, especially devs, do the interventionism.
Now dollar debt minimization is good if the close-door policy is aimed at boosting local consumption, growth and development. The Chinese have done this well and quite frankly, now, couldn't care less where the Federal debt winds blow.