pull down to refresh
This all sounds so good and I’m so excited to see it soon – even I that don’t post a lot. Thank you to improve it while keeping it simple to use.
I agree. He was unfortunate in his choice of words when he talked about adoption, because when I introduce someone to bitcoin the first interaction is through custodial LN. In that case running an email server is a good analogy for running your own Lightning channel.
That's why I said I can't apply the punishment. However, I can't enter into contracts with someone like that. My question goes in that direction.
Here I ask a different question with the same intent: if someone steals and kills an innocent person in a way that everyone knows, is it enough to simply not do business with that person? There is where common law applies ?
And in cases where I know an individual committed one of these crimes and everyone openly knows they did and they weren't punished, whatever the level of the crime, how should I, as an individual, behave if I cannot apply punishment because I'm not an interested party? Is cutting off my interactions with that person the only option? Like an exile.
The only ones who should care are the individual who is seeking this and the guardians of someone who is being steered toward it. Two corporations disagreeing matters little and shouldn't be a reason for those people not to pursue what they want.
But damn it, do I want it. The idea that everyday citizens of all walks of life are organizing and building out their own communications network with DIY hardware and open source software is incredibly exciting to me.
This is incredible and enough to me, the fact that you can communicate without needing anyone's permission and without needing someone to mediate the communication.
Those police actions that are being shared are ridiculous even among those who don't understand the concept you presented; however, the defense of those victims is done incorrectly because it is based on state law that "allows" the police to commit that violence. These people are validating those actions when they present themselves as citizens under the jurisprudence of their law and the police action of the agents. Taking advantage of this post and the image you shared about crime.
How is justice applied among sovereign individuals? I understand that its enforcement is carried out by the injured party and that the criminal does not lose his rights (life, property, and liberty), but rather assumes obligations. However, in extreme cases of violence between the parties, those rights will be violated between the parties involved.
My answer was a joke because @mo answered it very well.
Good news. Will you reveal the details in November? I hope these changes help highlight good discussions so they don’t die out quickly like they do now. I really like searching on SN first before ending up on dedicated pages and even old Reddit posts.
I didn’t notice the post that you mentioned there. Your post rise great questions to me and many other here in SN. Ty about that.
I like the zap and downzap system here because the weight of zap is highest than just like or dislike
I haven't documented it.
You did it now and very well with this comment here. I’m bookmarking it. Thank you.
I need to fix this CIC circle in my head because I feel lost amid many things and details that don't matter. I want to steer my sovereign life. There are things that go against the life I aspire to and that right now I don't have control over; I should worry about what I can control and take actions now that will let me control those things in the future — wasting time on them now is a waste. As @justin_shocknet said here, “I control what I can control, the rest is a matter of providence” ,