pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DeltaClimbs 16h \ on: You’re Being Lied To About “Ultra-Processed” Foods 😕 food_and_drinks
Go simp for fiat vegan seed oil bullshit elsewhere, faggot 🤡🤡🤡
On plus side, StackerNews seems to be breaking out beyond bitcoiners and attracting normies?
Breaking: I am announcing the first 2x gridscale blockchain powered nuclear energy plant in this comment. Your article is now obsolete.
Stopped reading because you're retarded.
Gold hasn't been a player in money for a long time. Equities and real estate are, and the US has the dominant position in those.
I was worried about this and switched away, but switched back and no problems. Phoenix far and away most reliable and easy to use
I never suggested Governments can or should be stopped from owning bitcoin.
It is simply the reality that many bitcoiners now are in a position to lobby and the US Government might do something to be "pro bitcoin." I am simply pointing out there is something pro-America that could be lobbied instead of a strategic reserve that would likely lead to a vastly better outcome, and seems more realistic to achieve, so why not push for that?
Pumping at maximum possible speed at all costs is myopic and is mostly driven by people who have not been around as long and have experienced less NGU. I am among those as class of 2017, but my perspective is that bitcoin is about fixing everything, so the path actually matters. Hyperbitcoinization happening 20 years from now rather than 15 is not necessarily worse. It could end up being better. Fixing everything is a dynamic process and some sort of "equilibrium" may take many decades beyond hyperbitcoinization.
Tell him your daughter will inevitably break up with him if he doesn't dump his shitcoins for bitcoin because only losers hold shitcoins. Simple.
"Your Google search is not..." lolololol, you just outed yourself as a spiritual leftist authoritarian. Experience? It's obvious you have no experience in any industry and are just dollar-store conspiracy theorist.
Google figured out the frobenius whatever eigen vector of the web graph a couple decades ago and have been selling ads ever since
Microsoft and Oracle mostly makes enterprise SaaS, pushing pixels
Yeah, they do cool stuff... resting on the chip technology developed for missile targeting by the military. Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop
The fraction of advanced research done at the big tech companies is very small overall. Nvidia and Apple do more interesting things, but by the nature of being stuff that has to be built in large volumes, it's less bleeding edge than what happens in aerospace & defense.
Lololol, excellent dump on OP spewing nonsense.
That Johnson & Johnson for Kamala tells you everything you need to know.
The companies making the world's most advanced tech backed Trump
YOU LYING FUCKING RETARD.
It takes two seconds to Google defense spending by state to see Texas is #1 and Florida is #4.
Defense makes actual aircraft and shit, it's literally the most reasonable thing for a government to do. Lockheed Martin is worth under $150b as the #1 contractor, which is very little.
Look at UNH after Obamacare. The healthcare industrial complex actually kills people. It kills Americans. And it produces nothing directly or indirectly of value, everyone knows the modern medical industry is mostly fake.
How will bitcoin fix anything if so many bitcoiners insist on acting retarded? Yes, bitcoin fixes things regardless, but you add decades of delays if you can't be smart from day 1 and need to lose a lot of bitcoin. Hopefully you hodl after hyperbitcoinization too. Don't invest.
Tbh please STFU with the term "reserve asset", it sounds retarded af. The concept of a "reserve asset" is totally vestigial. FIAT MONEY IS NOT BACKED BY RESERVES. 1971. STOP SAYING NONSENSE WORDS, OK?
How about you tip mass adoption in your own brain first and understand the actual transition dynamics of hyperbitcoinization.
Yes. There is no such thing as bitcoin as a "next gold" that is held in ETFs/banks and simply borrowed against. Fantasy from people scared of the change that is coming.
The most obnoxious thing I hear anyone say in bitcoin is the absurd notion that fiat will not go to zero.
I don't care about what that retard says and I am not watching it.
It is simply obviously literally true that there is no paper bitcoin, by definition. All the bitcoin exist in reality. Whatever things men say amongst themselves is just tawk -- what people say they will do doesn't matter, there is only reality. Why would you care about all the tawk? Bitcoin doesn't know what anyone "promises" or "threatens" and keeps working regardless.
You have made the same mistake nocoiners make when seeing shitcoiners and assuming bitcoin is part of that.
Almost everyone talking stablecoins is a fucking retard. In fact, it could very well be 100% other than myself, which I take no pride, in fact, I find it shameful to belong to such a species, but I digress.
Anyway, your axiomatic flaw is that you are discussing equilibrium states, which is nonsensical as we are not only not in an equilibrium, but we are approaching the most sudden economic singularity human history will ever witness.
You state ~dollars are not better than bitcoin as a unit of accout, but this is 1) wrong; 2) as nonsensical as people who say "bitcoin cannot be bitten like gold". Your statement "because this is a solved problem" is a logical non-sequitor -- perhaps you meant stablecoins are no better than dollars? When you have a complete understanding of Unit of Account, it all becomes a lot simpler. As the post a year ago asking about a bakery with prices fixed in bitcoin demonstrated, using bitcoin as your price will cause economic trade relationships and businesses to fail (sort of like an impedance mismatch -- you are vertex n + 1, with supplier as vertex n, but there is a web of customers in front, and lower tier supplier behind your supplier that are all on a different standard, which is volatile with respect to yours).
Wrote about all this here:
https://heaviside.substack.com/p/the-forgotten-fourth-function-of
Unit of Account is actually a lossy compression of Measure of Value plus Standard of Value, and when the latter is considered, two things became easy to admit as obvious 1) the US dollar is far and away the best monocomponent Standard of Value in the world today, and 2) the only thing that can beat the dollar on this measure is a multi-component / composite Standard of Value into which a fraction of bitcoin can be introduced. It is at that point where the discussion of a composite stablecoin vs a fictitious/emergent "composite coin of currency" that is realized as the implication of a complex sequence of forward contracts withing relational trade, labor agreements, or short term trade credit, lease agreeements, and so forth.
I truly tire of being this far ahead of fucking everyone for a 2017er, and this after openly sharing all this for two years (not to mention, it's been around since 1875). Kafkaesque af