pull down to refresh
Or he's desperate to distract from the Epstein files and will literally do anything to accomplish that need.
But you said "intelligence agencies" dumbass. I'm just trying to follow the plot with my low IQ over here. You seem to really have the details on this dark underworld of Bitcoin developers and their motivations.
The few times I've listened to him he starts out by explaining what an OG he is, how rich he's become from Bitcoin, all the companies he's invested in, drops his "proof of weapons" zinger and then just devolves from there into calling everything a psyop. He's like the Ray Kurzweil of Bitcoin, just make up a billion things, a couple stick and everyone thinks your genius.
But you just know they are operatives? Not which ones or in what way they are operating or how they are delivering their devious changes to Bitcoin, but just that they are. And I'm the dumbass? Got it.
I didn't put forward a solution, I simply pointed out your faux outrage is clearly partisan. You place the blame for the agency's issues at the feet of the democrats because they fight against the administration's use of DHS to murder American citizens in the street while completely ignoring the damage done by the Republican administration directly to CISA. The Democrats are attempting to reign in ICE and CISA gets caught in the crossfire because a massive amount of government agencies have been rolled up under DHS. You have a big problem with that but when CISA is directly neutered by the Republicans you are cool with it. Your take is bullshit.
Of all the things that he is "always a few steps ahead" on, which should I refute? It's a big ask and you are the one making the claim. The burden of proof is on the claimant.
Man, my IQ is taking a beating over here! Which of the devs are actually intelligence agency operatives? Which of their contributions to the Bitcoin codebase serve their masters and their nefarious purposes? You've raised the alarm so let's out them and keep Bitcoin pure!
Guessing you have some evidence of their corruption? Would love to see it. A blanket claim that anyone that would dedicate their time to Bitcoin is clearly a spy or operative is just cynical horseshit. You must live in a very dark world...
Yeah, those damn Democrats!
Since taking office in January 2025, the Trump administration has significantly reduced the size and changed the mission of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) as part of a broader federal workforce reduction.
Personnel and Leadership Changes
- Workforce Reductions: CISA has lost approximately one-third of its workforce (about 1,000 employees) since early 2025 through a combination of layoffs, buyouts, and voluntary departures
- Executive Purge: Nearly all top officials at CISA, including division leaders and regional directors, have left or were ousted. This includes the Chief Strategy Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and several regional heads.
- Budget Cuts: In May 2025, the administration proposed a 17% budget cut to CISA, targeting over $490 million in funding.
Shift in Agency Mission
- Election Security: The administration has halted many of CISA's election security activities, ending funding for systems that alert states to election threats. This was driven by the administration’s focus on moving away from monitoring social media for misinformation.
- Regulatory Rollback: Executive Order 14306 (June 2025) removed requirements for government contractors to submit "machine-readable attestations" of their software security, shifting toward voluntary compliance.
- AI and Automation: New directives have narrowed CISA’s focus to using AI specifically for automating cybersecurity functions and identifying vulnerabilities, rather than broader research.
- Resilience Strategy: A March 2025 Executive Order shifted more responsibility for cyber preparedness from the federal level to state and local governments.
First thing to have done was put authenticated voting results on the blockchain using Simpleproof. That would at least handle the chain of custody concern because you know the next move is for Trump minions to modify the voting results to "show" the fraud they could never prove. And even if they did uncover a problem, which they wouldn't, their claims can't be accepted because chain of custody and authenticity is now destroyed.
I understand the argument and the richness of 2A advocates, like Trump /s, condemning the guy for carrying legally but this video said the two things I pointed out. Words, words, words, Trump can be a pedophile and wipe his ass with the Constitution as long as he appoints judges that are 2A friendly, words, words, words, this guy died because he was dumb enough to legally carry at a protest that put him into direct contact with agent of the state.
This guy said he only cares or speaks about the gun part of the situation but then immediately lays down the reason Trump is all good in his book because reasons. The video doesn't deliver on the stated point of the video. Noise and equivocation.
So what's the claim here? Because people are converting their stablecoins to USD this is a bad sign for Bitcoin? And the mechanism that creates the peril is what exactly? Less liquidity in the stablecoin market? I don't get it.
That's a lot of words that can be summarized thusly:
Trump in power, regardless of any of the shit he does or says, is ok because he's better for 2A because of the judges he appoints and the guy brought it on himself for carrying at a protest and getting in an interaction with armed agents of the state.
The rest is just noise and equivocation.
Electricity use curtailment due to the massive winter storm. Should come back quickly: https://cointelegraph.com/news/foundry-usa-hashrate-down-60-deadly-storm
It helps when the DOJ is scrubbing and suppressing proof of Trump's guilt.
https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/major-update-andrew-formerly-prince
"According to Roger Sollenberger, DOJ records show the FBI interviewed a woman who accused Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her as a minor at least four times in 2019, but a related document cataloguing those interviews, previously accessible in the DOJ’s Epstein files and provided to Ghislaine Maxwell’s defense, has since been removed from the department’s public database, raising questions about the completeness and transparency of the Epstein file release."