pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BallLightning 26 Sep \ parent \ on: HOLDING BITCOIN BACK - The MoE situation 💰🤝💵 bitcoin
No. This would actually deplete your liquidity
I think a big problem is that if you want to use lightning you need to periodically pay for inbound liquidity. And it is quite expensive.
That's useful information. But why put it here as an off-topic instead of starting a new thread?
Why is it so often here that I encounter someone posting a question and receiving replies that don't answer or don't attempt to answer it?
It is not built on false premise. I am asking why isn't the limit INSIDE consensus rules. This is the WHOLE point of this question, nothing more.
Well, that's a good post, but unfortunately it's off-topic since it doesn't answer or try to answer the question in the original post.
I made a suggestion how filters for blocks can be implemented WITHOUT causing a chain split: #1205562
I have forgotten about knots, but when I get home i will try to run it (i downloaded it some time ago, but then got distracted and did't even sync the blockchain).
OK... I think using non-neutral adjectives has the downside of making the discussion less factual and more emotional.
I would advice anybody who wants to really learn about the real dangers of AI to check Robert Miles's youtube channel. Many other people are misrepresenting the dangers or are presenting "dangers" that are missing the real danger.
Error correction is not needed here. Camera quality is good enough to have zero errors and also invoices and bitcoin addresses have checksums