pull down to refresh
@1984
stacking since: #745580
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @1984 4 Sep \ parent \ on: Core & Knots aren't the only choices bitcoin
hmm I see your point, honestly can't remember the entire argument and also forgot which influencer said it, and don't wan to go back to find out
if I am not mistaken the argument goes like this:
- with inscriptions the "objectionable data" is spread out in multiple utxos
- so one could say that this is a plausible deniability when it comes to child pornography, since no-one can point to a specific utxo and say that noderunners are hosting "objectionable data" unless they use software to see the inscription lol
however, with OP_RETURN, the "objectionable data" can be put into a single utxo - so one can point to it and say that noderunners are hosting it
@DarthCoin i've seen you comment this multiple times before "Are we not done with this crap debate" and I fully agree. however, never saw you comment about this thesis, just curious:
- increasing datacarrieresize comes with the downside that higher image quality of child pornography can be put onchain, without having to use inscriptions
- node runners would effectively be hosting this kind of stuff forever
cashuBo2FteCJodHRwczovL21pbnQubWluaWJpdHMuY2FzaC9CaXRjb2luYXVjc2F0YXSBomFpSABQBVDwSUFGYXCBo2FhAmFzeEAzMjQxYTlhZmRlMDQ0NDEwZGUzZGM2MTZmY2FkYjY1ZDgwMDY4NThkMzVhNmRlZGY3NTZkZTJiY2JlOGIzMWE3YWNYIQJ4Me-MBzg9krFaQreUy8lq-BsREmRnXgVDZD621PN0cw
GENESIS